S.O.S. Mathematics CyberBoard

Your Resource for mathematics help on the web!
It is currently Sat, 25 May 2013 00:34:20 UTC

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Limit 2
PostPosted: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 04:02:37 UTC 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:16:54 UTC
Posts: 64
Evaluate the given limits and prove your conclusion.

$\lim_{x\to1}\frac{x^2-x-2}{2x-3} = |x-1||\frac{x-4}{2x-3}|

Trying to get the upper bound for the second part, my professor told me to ch0ose |x-1|<1/4 instead of my original |x-1|<1, from here I know how to proceed but I dont understand why he had this restriction. In general when can you not put a bound say 1 on |x-s|<1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Episilon-delta limit
PostPosted: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 04:09:43 UTC 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:25:14 UTC
Posts: 12103
Location: Austin, TX
Post new questions in new topics. Topic split.

_________________
(\ /)
(O.o)
(> <)
This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Limit 2
PostPosted: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 04:12:48 UTC 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:16:54 UTC
Posts: 64
Yes sir. And yeah, I think I get my question now. It's because x cannot equal 3/2, and saying |x-1|<1 implies that x could possibly equal 3/2, so by saying |x-1|<1/4, the maximum value x could be is 1.25, which is less than 1.5, so it's safe to say.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Limit 2
PostPosted: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 04:15:04 UTC 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:49:32 UTC
Posts: 6009
Location: 127.0.0.1, ::1 (avatar courtesy of UDN)
doodlenoodle wrote:
Evaluate the given limits and prove your conclusion.

$\lim_{x\to1}\frac{x^2-x-2}{2x-3} = |x-1||\frac{x-4}{2x-3}|

Trying to get the upper bound for the second part, my professor told me to ch0ose |x-1|<1/4 instead of my original |x-1|<1, from here I know how to proceed but I dont understand why he had this restriction. In general when can you not put a bound say 1 on |x-s|<1


What is this nonsense? The LHS \displaystyle\lim_{x\to1}\frac{x^2-x-2}{2x-3} is a number, the RHS \displaystyle\lvert x-1\rvert\left\lvert\frac{x-4}{2x-3}\right\rvert is a nonconstant function of x, and you are asserting they are equal?

_________________
\begin{aligned}
Spin(1)&=O(1)=\mathbb{Z}/2&\quad&\text{and}\\
Spin(2)&=U(1)=SO(2)&&\text{are obvious}\\
Spin(3)&=Sp(1)=SU(2)&&\text{by }q\mapsto(\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}\mathbb{H}\ni p\mapsto qp\bar{q})\\
Spin(4)&=Sp(1)\times Sp(1)&&\text{by }(q_1,q_2)\mapsto(\mathbb{H}\ni p\mapsto q_1p\bar{q_2})\\
Spin(5)&=Sp(2)&&\text{by }\mathbb{HP}^1\cong S^4_{round}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^5\\
Spin(6)&=SU(4)&&\text{by the irrep }\Lambda_+\mathbb{C}^4
\end{aligned}


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Limit 2
PostPosted: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 04:23:00 UTC 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:16:54 UTC
Posts: 64
No no no, must have worded my question poorly. I was meaning to ask how to find the bounds on the

|\frac{x-4}{2x-3} term, and now I see why I must chose |x-1|<1/4, and thus |x-4| is bounded by -13/4<x-4<-11/4 and that

|2x-3| is bounded by -5/2<2x-3<-1/2, I would take the fraction then to be |\frac{x-4}{2x-3}|<13/2


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Limit 2
PostPosted: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 04:26:10 UTC 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:25:14 UTC
Posts: 12103
Location: Austin, TX
doodlenoodle wrote:
No no no, must have worded my question poorly. I was meaning to ask how to find the bounds on the

|\frac{x-4}{2x-3} term, and now I see why I must chose |x-1|<1/4, and thus |x-4| is bounded by -13/4<x-4<-11/4 and that

|2x-3| is bounded by -5/2<2x-3<-3/2, I would take the fraction then to be |\frac{x-4}{2x-3}|<13/6


I don't even see how you are relating the bit of functions on each side, I still object to what thinking either side has to do with one another.

_________________
(\ /)
(O.o)
(> <)
This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Limit 2
PostPosted: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 04:30:16 UTC 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:16:54 UTC
Posts: 64
For a Delta Epsilon proof, I would have Let e>0 be given, we need to find d>0 such that if 0<|x-1|<d, then |f(x)-2|<e.

Do what I did,

Choose d=min{1/4,(13/2)e}. Then if |x-1|<d, then |f(x)-2|<e.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Limit 2
PostPosted: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 04:39:51 UTC 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:49:32 UTC
Posts: 6009
Location: 127.0.0.1, ::1 (avatar courtesy of UDN)
doodlenoodle wrote:
For a Delta Epsilon proof, I would have Let e>0 be given, we need to find d>0 such that if 0<|x-1|<d, then |f(x)-2|<e.

Do what I did,

Choose d=min{1/4,(13/2)e}. Then if |x-1|<d, then |f(x)-2|<e.


Well, a proof is, at a start, a coherent prose. Maybe you need to improve in that department first instead of making us second guessing what you might mean to say as opposed to what you said. You haven't shown what you did between \displaystyle\lim_{x\to 1}\frac{x^2-x-2}{2x-3} and \displaystyle\lvert x-1\rvert\left\lvert\frac{x-4}{2x-3}\right\rvert except an equal sign between them, and so "(D)o what I did" is a definite no-no.

_________________
\begin{aligned}
Spin(1)&=O(1)=\mathbb{Z}/2&\quad&\text{and}\\
Spin(2)&=U(1)=SO(2)&&\text{are obvious}\\
Spin(3)&=Sp(1)=SU(2)&&\text{by }q\mapsto(\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}\mathbb{H}\ni p\mapsto qp\bar{q})\\
Spin(4)&=Sp(1)\times Sp(1)&&\text{by }(q_1,q_2)\mapsto(\mathbb{H}\ni p\mapsto q_1p\bar{q_2})\\
Spin(5)&=Sp(2)&&\text{by }\mathbb{HP}^1\cong S^4_{round}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^5\\
Spin(6)&=SU(4)&&\text{by the irrep }\Lambda_+\mathbb{C}^4
\end{aligned}


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Limit 2
PostPosted: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 04:43:36 UTC 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:16:54 UTC
Posts: 64
Definitely over-complicated things. My original question was why couldn't I bound |x-1|<1. I did not mean to answer the question or act as if this was a proof I'd turn in. Also the original post was in my previous Delta-Epsilon topic so my preface was thrown off. My mistake though, I will try and be more clear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Limit 2
PostPosted: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 05:07:02 UTC 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:25:14 UTC
Posts: 12103
Location: Austin, TX
doodlenoodle wrote:
Definitely over-complicated things. My original question was why couldn't I bound |x-1|<1. I did not mean to answer the question or act as if this was a proof I'd turn in. Also the original post was in my previous Delta-Epsilon topic so my preface was thrown off. My mistake though, I will try and be more clear.


Yes, that's fine, but we still have no idea why you would want to talk about |x-1| in the first place, much less why you would want it less than 1 or 1/4 or something else entirely. Even knowing this is epsilonics, doesn't explain what you're talking about for this particular problem, which you always need to explain, otherwise we have little possibility of understanding you.

_________________
(\ /)
(O.o)
(> <)
This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Limit 2
PostPosted: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 05:10:52 UTC 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:49:32 UTC
Posts: 6009
Location: 127.0.0.1, ::1 (avatar courtesy of UDN)
doodlenoodle wrote:
Definitely over-complicated things. My original question was why couldn't I bound |x-1|<1. I did not mean to answer the question or act as if this was a proof I'd turn in. Also the original post was in my previous Delta-Epsilon topic so my preface was thrown off. My mistake though, I will try and be more clear.


Huh? This question has nothing to do with your previous thread (\displaystyle\lim_{x\to -1}\frac{1}{(x^2+1)^{1/2}}=\frac{1}{2^{1/2}} has nothing to do with \displaystyle\lim_{x\to 1}\frac{x^2-x-2}{2x-3} or \displaystyle\lvert x-1\rvert\left\lvert\frac{x-4}{2x-3}\right\rvert), which is the reason why it was split off.

_________________
\begin{aligned}
Spin(1)&=O(1)=\mathbb{Z}/2&\quad&\text{and}\\
Spin(2)&=U(1)=SO(2)&&\text{are obvious}\\
Spin(3)&=Sp(1)=SU(2)&&\text{by }q\mapsto(\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}\mathbb{H}\ni p\mapsto qp\bar{q})\\
Spin(4)&=Sp(1)\times Sp(1)&&\text{by }(q_1,q_2)\mapsto(\mathbb{H}\ni p\mapsto q_1p\bar{q_2})\\
Spin(5)&=Sp(2)&&\text{by }\mathbb{HP}^1\cong S^4_{round}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^5\\
Spin(6)&=SU(4)&&\text{by the irrep }\Lambda_+\mathbb{C}^4
\end{aligned}


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Contact Us | S.O.S. Mathematics Homepage
Privacy Statement | Search the "old" CyberBoard

users online during the last hour
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005-2011 phpBB Group.
Copyright © 1999-2013 MathMedics, LLC. All rights reserved.
Math Medics, LLC. - P.O. Box 12395 - El Paso TX 79913 - USA