S.O.S. Mathematics CyberBoard

Your Resource for mathematics help on the web!
It is currently Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:48:21 UTC

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Doubt in linear algebra
PostPosted: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 16:35:21 UTC 
Offline
S.O.S. Newbie

Joined: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 16:30:00 UTC
Posts: 3
I have got a problem like A*x=lambda*x
where A is of order d*d
x is of order d*c
lambda is a constant
A and lambda are known and matrix x is unknown.
Is there any function in matlab that solves this problem??
Solution needed urgently.
Thanks in advance for any kind of help


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Doubt in linear algebra
PostPosted: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:26:11 UTC 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:25:14 UTC
Posts: 12170
Location: Austin, TX
Asha wrote:
I have got a problem like A*x=lambda*x
where A is of order d*d
x is of order d*c
lambda is a constant
A and lambda are known and matrix x is unknown.
Is there any function in matlab that solves this problem??
Solution needed urgently.
Thanks in advance for any kind of help


What do you mean order of a? You mean the size of the matrix?

You just have to solve (A-\lambda I_d)x=0 and that is easy, since solving a homogeneous equation just amounts to putting the matrix into row-echelon form, so the answer is "yes, just tell Matlab to do ref (or rref) on A-\lambda I_d).

_________________
(\ /)
(O.o)
(> <)
This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Doubt in linear algebra
PostPosted: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:26:24 UTC 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:25:14 UTC
Posts: 12170
Location: Austin, TX
Topic moved to Matrix Algebra.

_________________
(\ /)
(O.o)
(> <)
This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Doubt in linear algebra
PostPosted: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:49:40 UTC 
Offline
S.O.S. Newbie

Joined: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 16:30:00 UTC
Posts: 3
Yeah..by order i meant size of the matrix given as no. of rows by no. of columns.
I am aware of the procedure of solving homogeneous system of equations in the case where x in the above post is a vector i.e of size k by 1
but in my problem it is of size c by d where c>1 and d>1...does your solution still hold??


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Doubt in linear algebra
PostPosted: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:56:41 UTC 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:49:32 UTC
Posts: 6067
Location: 127.0.0.1, ::1 (avatar courtesy of UDN)
Asha wrote:
Yeah..by order i meant size of the matrix given as no. of rows by no. of columns.
I am aware of the procedure of solving homogeneous system of equations in the case where x in the above post is a vector i.e of size k by 1
but in my problem it is of size c by d where c>1 and d>1...does your solution still hold??


Consider each column separately.

_________________
\begin{aligned}
Spin(1)&=O(1)=\mathbb{Z}/2&\quad&\text{and}\\
Spin(2)&=U(1)=SO(2)&&\text{are obvious}\\
Spin(3)&=Sp(1)=SU(2)&&\text{by }q\mapsto(\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}\mathbb{H}\ni p\mapsto qp\bar{q})\\
Spin(4)&=Sp(1)\times Sp(1)&&\text{by }(q_1,q_2)\mapsto(\mathbb{H}\ni p\mapsto q_1p\bar{q_2})\\
Spin(5)&=Sp(2)&&\text{by }\mathbb{HP}^1\cong S^4_{round}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^5\\
Spin(6)&=SU(4)&&\text{by the irrep }\Lambda_+\mathbb{C}^4
\end{aligned}


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Doubt in linear algebra
PostPosted: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:12:18 UTC 
Offline
S.O.S. Newbie

Joined: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 16:30:00 UTC
Posts: 3
That will lead to a different lambda or eigen value for each column when we do it column wise....I wish to get a single lambda for entire x as a whole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Doubt in linear algebra
PostPosted: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:21:41 UTC 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:25:14 UTC
Posts: 12170
Location: Austin, TX
Asha wrote:
That will lead to a different lambda or eigen value for each column when we do it column wise....I wish to get a single lambda for entire x as a whole


No, because you're solving the system for A-\lambda I_d, which means if it satisfies that for each column, then it satisfies that for the whole matrix, so outermeasure's suggestion is exactly the right idea.

_________________
(\ /)
(O.o)
(> <)
This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Contact Us | S.O.S. Mathematics Homepage
Privacy Statement | Search the "old" CyberBoard

users online during the last hour
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005-2011 phpBB Group.
Copyright © 1999-2013 MathMedics, LLC. All rights reserved.
Math Medics, LLC. - P.O. Box 12395 - El Paso TX 79913 - USA