S.O.S. Mathematics CyberBoard

Your Resource for mathematics help on the web!
It is currently Sat, 18 May 2013 20:52:25 UTC

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Spring System
PostPosted: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 19:15:35 UTC 
Offline
S.O.S. Newbie

Joined: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:50:51 UTC
Posts: 2
Is the approach correct for this sort of problem?

A 32 lb object stretches a spring 8 ft. If the resistive force due to damping is 5x' , determine the displacement function if the object is released from 1 ft below the equilibrium position with an upward velocity of 1 ft/sec.

Here is what I have:
w = m(32ft/s)
f = ma
f = k(s + x)
mx'' + cx' + kx = 0

x(0) = 8ft
x'(0) = 1ft/s
c = 5

w = m(32ft/s): 32lb = m(32ft/s) m = 1 slug
f = k(x + x): f = kx 32 = k*8 k = 4

1x'' + 5x' + 4x = 0

So I took the Laplace transform of that and got this:

s^(2)X - sx(0) - x'(0) + 5[sX - x(0)] + 4X = 0
s^(2)X - 8s - 1 + 5[sX - 1] + 4X = 0
s^(2)X + 5sX +4X - 8x - 2 = 0
X(s^2 + 5s + 4) = 8s + 2

X = (8s + 2)/(s+4)(s+1)

The inverse Laplace of X yeilded 10e^(-4t) - 2e^(-t)

Thanks!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Spring System
PostPosted: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 11:01:30 UTC 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:49:32 UTC
Posts: 6003
Location: 127.0.0.1, ::1 (avatar courtesy of UDN)
Bryon0101 wrote:
Is the approach correct for this sort of problem?

A 32 lb object stretches a spring 8 ft. If the resistive force due to damping is 5x' , determine the displacement function if the object is released from 1 ft below the equilibrium position with an upward velocity of 1 ft/sec.

Here is what I have:
w = m(32ft/s)
f = ma
f = k(s + x)
mx'' + cx' + kx = 0

x(0) = 8ft
x'(0) = 1ft/s
c = 5

w = m(32ft/s): 32lb = m(32ft/s) m = 1 slug
f = k(x + x): f = kx 32 = k*8 k = 4

1x'' + 5x' + 4x = 0

So I took the Laplace transform of that and got this:

s^(2)X - sx(0) - x'(0) + 5[sX - x(0)] + 4X = 0
s^(2)X - 8s - 1 + 5[sX - 1] + 4X = 0
s^(2)X + 5sX +4X - 8x - 2 = 0
X(s^2 + 5s + 4) = 8s + 2

X = (8s + 2)/(s+4)(s+1)

The inverse Laplace of X yeilded 10e^(-4t) - 2e^(-t)

Thanks!


No. Note the initial condition highlighted in red, which your answer fails to satisfy.

_________________
\begin{aligned}
Spin(1)&=O(1)=\mathbb{Z}/2&\quad&\text{and}\\
Spin(2)&=U(1)=SO(2)&&\text{are obvious}\\
Spin(3)&=Sp(1)=SU(2)&&\text{by }q\mapsto(\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}\mathbb{H}\ni p\mapsto qp\bar{q})\\
Spin(4)&=Sp(1)\times Sp(1)&&\text{by }(q_1,q_2)\mapsto(\mathbb{H}\ni p\mapsto q_1p\bar{q_2})\\
Spin(5)&=Sp(2)&&\text{by }\mathbb{HP}^1\cong S^4_{round}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^5\\
Spin(6)&=SU(4)&&\text{by the irrep }\Lambda_+\mathbb{C}^4
\end{aligned}


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Contact Us | S.O.S. Mathematics Homepage
Privacy Statement | Search the "old" CyberBoard

users online during the last hour
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005-2011 phpBB Group.
Copyright © 1999-2013 MathMedics, LLC. All rights reserved.
Math Medics, LLC. - P.O. Box 12395 - El Paso TX 79913 - USA