Shadow wrote:
asa.hoshi wrote:
i think i meant to say that n^3 grows faster then n^2 for q.d). And Cos they dont grow at the same speed, ans is no. Then is that right?
In particular it's because

isn't between the two bounds (it's not

)
i think im confusing myself here.
but for a) in

.
Okay, so i know that comparing

and

. Obviously,

grows faster. And

is faster than

.
So, having said that is it consistent with the fact that the alrogithm whose running time is in

and

? Because it is within the bounds of both running times. Does that make sense?
Or... is it because, the question says, no faster than

, but the algorithm can run faster than

and up to

? So answer is inconsistent.