S.O.S. Mathematics CyberBoard

Your Resource for mathematics help on the web!
It is currently Fri, 24 May 2013 06:15:25 UTC

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Question involving joined particles, string and elastic...
PostPosted: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 01:54:37 UTC 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:52:49 UTC
Posts: 119
Location: Bolton, England
AAAGGHHH !!!!

Can anybody help with this question. I've been working on it here and there for the pass week.

Quote:
One end of an elastic string, of natural length a and modulus Mg, is tied to a particle of mass m lying on a smooth horizontal table, the other end being fastened to a fixed point A on the table. An inelastic string, also fastened to the particle, passes over the edge of the table and carries a mass M hanging vertically.

The particle is held at rest at A, the inelastic string being taut, and is then released. Find the greatest extension of the elastic string and prove that m returns to A after time -

2(\pi+\sqrt{2}-arctan{\sqrt{2}})\sqrt{[(M+m)a/Mg]}


Here's my diagram illustrating the problem.

Image

To tackle this problem I've used two models, one for x\leq a and the other for x\geq a.

Using the following:

T_{i}=\frac{gmM}{(m+M)}

T_{e}=\frac{Mg(x-a)}{a}


\hline

Case 1 x\leq a


Concentrating on the acceleration on particle M.

M\ddot{x}=Mg - T_{i}

\ddot{x}=g - \frac{T_{i}}{M}

Integrating produces the velocity

\dot{x}=gt- \frac{T_{i}}{M}t

Integrating produces the distance

x=\frac{gt^{2}}{2}-\frac{T_{i}}{2M}t^2=\frac{gt^{2}}{2}-\frac{gmt^{2}}{2(m+M)}=\frac{gt^{2}}{2}(1+\frac{m}{(m+M)})

Rearranging for t

t=\sqrt{\frac{2x(m+M)}{g(2m+M)}}

When

x=a, t=\sqrt{\frac{2a(m+M)}{g(2m+M)}}


\hline

Case 2 x\geq a


Concentrating on the acceleration on particle M.

M\ddot{x}=Mg - T_{i} - T_{e}

\ddot{x}=g - \frac{gm}{(m+M)} - \frac{g(x-a)}{a}=2g - \frac{gm}{(m+M)} - \frac{gx}{a}

Rearranging.

\ddot{x}+\frac{gx}{a} =2g - \frac{gm}{(m+M)}


This is in the form \ddot{x}+\alpha^{2}x=\beta(SHM equation), with the general solution of x=Acos{\alpha}t+Bsin{\alpha}t+\frac{\beta}{\alpha^{2}}

therefore x = Acos(\sqrt{\frac{g}{a}})t+Bsin(\sqrt{\frac{g}{a}})t+{2a}-\frac{am}{(m+M)}

To find A we use t=0, x=a

a = A+2a-\frac{am}{(m+M)}

Therefore A = - \frac{aM}{(m + M)}

To find B we use velocity at t = 0, x = a.

\dot{x} = -\sqrt{\frac{g}{a}}Asin(\sqrt{\frac{g}{a}})t+\sqrt{\frac{g}{a}}Bcos(\sqrt{\frac{g}{a}})t

\dot{x} = \sqrt{\frac{g}{a}}B

at x = a, t=\sqrt{\frac{2a(m+M)}{g(2m+M)}},

\dot{x}=gt-\frac{gmMt}{M(m+M)}=g(\sqrt{\frac{2a(m+M)}{g(2m+M)}})-\frac{gmM(\sqrt{\frac{2a(m+M)}{g(2m+M)}})}{M(m+M)} YUK!!!

therefore B = \frac{gt-\frac{gmMt}{M(m+M)}=g(\sqrt{\frac{2a(m+M)}{g(2m+M)}})-\frac{gmM(\sqrt{\frac{2a(m+M)}{g(2m+M)}})}{M(m+M)}}{\sqrt{\frac{g}{a}}}

There's probably no point in continuing, as you can see this is rapidly running out of control!!!

Can somebody nudge me back onto the path?


Many thanks,

Lee


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 02:56:01 UTC 
Offline
Member of the 'S.O.S. Math' Hall of Fame

Joined: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:36:12 UTC
Posts: 826
Location: Las Cruces
Are T_i and T_e the tension in the inelastic thread? If so, since the thread is inelastic they should have the same magnitude. It seems to me the simple minded approach (for x < a) is

(Mg - T) = M y" , where y'' is the acceleration of the particle hanging down.

T = mx'' where x'' is the acceleration of the particle on the table.

x'' = y'', in magnitude. Would that be consistent with your result?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 09:33:14 UTC 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:52:49 UTC
Posts: 119
Location: Bolton, England
T_{i} is the tension in the inelastic thread connecting particle m to particle M
T_{e} is the tension in the elastic thread connecting particle m to table at point A.

Sorry, I forgot to label these in the diagram.

Lee


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 16:19:12 UTC 
Offline
Member of the 'S.O.S. Math' Hall of Fame

Joined: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:36:12 UTC
Posts: 826
Location: Las Cruces
I understand how you got the formula for Ti when x < a. But are you using this same formula when x > a? If Ti is constant, wouldn't the larger mass always move as if under a constant force?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 17:25:30 UTC 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:52:49 UTC
Posts: 119
Location: Bolton, England
Yes I'm using the same formula for T_{i} when x\geq a, however I assumed the movement of larger Mass M isn't a constant since we also have T_{e} of the elastic.

Do you think the initial formula for acceleration after x\geq a is incorrect?

M\ddot{x}=Mg-T_{i}-T_{e}

Cheers,

Lee


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 18:00:46 UTC 
Offline
Member of the 'S.O.S. Math' Hall of Fame

Joined: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:36:12 UTC
Posts: 826
Location: Las Cruces
Let T (without subscript) be the magnitude of the tension in the inelastic thread.
For x > a, I think of the situation as:

eq 1: T - (x-a)k = mx'' (As I read the problem, k = Mg)
eq 2: T - Mg = My''
eq 3: y'' = -x'' (Taking positive y to point upwards and positive x to point to the right.)

So I would solve for x'' and then for T. That might agree with what you get, but it isn't obvious to me that T is the sum of the force from elastic thread and some constant.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 02:47:16 UTC 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:52:49 UTC
Posts: 119
Location: Bolton, England
Mmmm...

using \ddot{x}=-\ddot{y}

T=\frac{gM(Mx-Ma+ma)}{a(m+M)}

(Notice when x=a at t=0 in the second model, T=\frac{gmM}{(m+M)}, as in the original formula)

Do I substitute this into T - (x-a)k=m\ddot{x}, producing...

\frac{gM(Mx-Ma+ma)}{a(m+M)} - \frac{gM(x-a)}{a} = m \ddot x

Cheers,

Lee


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 03:39:47 UTC 
Offline
Member of the 'S.O.S. Math' Hall of Fame

Joined: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:36:12 UTC
Posts: 826
Location: Las Cruces
You like to manipulate symbols more than I do. I would do this:

T = Mg + My'' (from eq 2)
= Mg - Mx''

Substitute for T in eq 1:

Mg - Mx'' - (x-a)k = mx''

Mg - (x-a)k = Mx'' + mx''

Mg = (x-a)k + (M+m)x''

Mg +ak = kx + (M+m)x''

I would solve the differential equation. Then if I was interested in T for its own sake, I would find it from T = Mg - Mx''


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 00:43:50 UTC 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:52:49 UTC
Posts: 119
Location: Bolton, England
Many thanks tashirosgt.

Using your equations, I have almost derived the answer given.

\hline

Case 1 x \leq a


m\ddot{x}=T.......(1)

M\ddot{y}=-Mg+T.......(2)

since \ddot{x}=-\ddot{y}, we can rewrite (2) as

M\ddot{x}=-Mg+T

Rearranging for T produces

T=-M\ddot{x}+Mg.......(3)

Sub (3) into (1) produces

\ddot{x}=\frac{Mg}{m+M}

Integrating produces the velocity

\dot{x}=\frac{Mgt}{m+M}.......(4)

Integrating again produces distance

x=\frac{Mgt^2}{2(m+M)}

Rearranging for t, produces

t=\sqrt{\frac{2x(m+M)}{Mg}}

At x=a, t=\sqrt{\frac{2a(m+M)}{Mg}}.......(5)

\hline

Case 2 x \geq a

Mg + ak = kx + (M+m)\ddot{x}, where k=\frac{Mg}{a}

2Mg = \frac{Mgx}{a} + (M+m)\ddot{x}

Using the general formula for SHM, produces

x=sin(\sqrt{\frac{Mg}{a(M+m)}}t)\sqrt{2}{a}-cos(\sqrt{\frac{Mg}{a(M+m)}}t)a+2a

Differentiate for velocity. Equating velocity to zero will yield the time at which particle 'm' reaches its maximum distance x, before changing direction.

0=\frac{sin(\sqrt{\frac{Mg}{a(M+m)}}t)\sqrt{2aMg}-cos(\sqrt{\frac{Mg}{a(M+m)}}t)\sqrt{aMg}}{\sqrt{M+m}}

Rearranging for t produces

-arctan(\sqrt{2})\sqrt{\frac{a(m+M)}{Mg}}.......(6)

Adding (5) and (6) together and doubling the result produces the total travel time from 'A and back again.

t_{total}=2(\sqrt{2}-arctan(\sqrt{2})) \sqrt{\frac{a(m+M)}{Mg}}


I must have missed something, since in the question there's a \pi term, which I don't have?


Cheers,

Lee


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:04:11 UTC 
Offline
Member of the 'S.O.S. Math' Hall of Fame

Joined: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:36:12 UTC
Posts: 826
Location: Las Cruces
How are the initial conditions used when you derived the solution to the equation for simple harmonic motion? What is "time zero" for that equation. You equation shows that at time 0 the x(0) = a, but the first time x(t) = a is sometime later than when the experiment starts (the release of the body at point A).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 00:57:57 UTC 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:52:49 UTC
Posts: 119
Location: Bolton, England
I treated the second case (x\geq a), as an independent model from the first with initial conditions

x=a, t=0, \dot{x}=\sqrt{\frac{2a(m+M)}{Mg}}

I then summed the 'travel time' for both models to produce the total travel time. Is this approach incorrect?

Cheers,

Lee

PS thanks for being so patient :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 17:11:03 UTC 
Offline
Member of the 'S.O.S. Math' Hall of Fame

Joined: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:36:12 UTC
Posts: 826
Location: Las Cruces
I believe it is OK to use two models. If I take a legalistic reading of the problem, it says to prove that the particle returns to A at a certain time, not that this is the first time that it gets there. I am curious whether the time in answer works given the models we have. (not a particularly easy question to answer)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Contact Us | S.O.S. Mathematics Homepage
Privacy Statement | Search the "old" CyberBoard

users online during the last hour
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005-2011 phpBB Group.
Copyright © 1999-2013 MathMedics, LLC. All rights reserved.
Math Medics, LLC. - P.O. Box 12395 - El Paso TX 79913 - USA