S.O.S. Mathematics CyberBoard

Your Resource for mathematics help on the web!
It is currently Sat, 25 May 2013 09:25:22 UTC

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: tensor - Partial Differentiation
PostPosted: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:43:01 UTC 
Offline
S.O.S. Newbie

Joined: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:30:11 UTC
Posts: 1
Location: Laval, Quebec, Canada
I have undertaken to learn Tensor Calculus and have come across the following problem which I have some understanding of, however, I also have a couple of questions to clarify. Here goes with the problem:

If the a_{i,j} are constants, calculate the partial derivative of \frac{\partial}{\partial x_{k}}(a_{ij}x_{i}x_{j})

The solution:

To begin with I did revert to \sum{}notation:

\sum_{ij}a_{ij}x_{i}x_{j}=\sum_{i\neq k, j\neq k}a_{ij}x_{i}x_{j}+\sum_{i=k, j\neq k}a_{ij}x_{i}x_{j}+\sum_{i\neq k, j=k}a_{ij}x_{i}x_{j}+\sum_{i=k, j=k}a_{ij}x_{i}x_{j}

\sum_{ij}a_{ij}x_{i}x_{j}=C +\left(\sum_{j\neq k}a_{kj}x_{j}\right)x_{k}+\left(\sum_{i\neq k}a_{ik}x_{i}\right)x_{k}+a_{kk}(x_{k})^2

where C is independent of x_{k}

Differentiating with respect to x_{k}:

\frac{\partial }{\partial x_{k}}\left(\sum_{ij}a_{ij}x_{i}x_{j}\right)= 0 +\sum_{j\neq k}a_{kj}x_{j}+\sum_{i\neq k}a_{ik}x_{i}+2a_{kk}x_{k}


\frac{\partial }{\partial x_{k}}\left(\sum_{ij}a_{ij}x_{i}x_{j}\right)= \sum_{j}a_{kj}x_{j}+\sum_{i}a_{ik}x_{i}

Reverting to Einstein's summation convention:

\frac{\partial }{\partial x_{k}}\left(\sum_{ij}a_{ij}x_{i}x_{j}\right)=a_{kj}x_{j}+a_{ik}x_{i}= a_{ki}x_{i}+a_ik}x_{i}=\left(a_{ki}+a_{ik)\right)x_{i}

Now, here are my questions:

Why does \sum_{i\neq k, j\neq k}a_{ij}x_{i}x_{j}$ = C

and why does the term 2a_{kk}x_{k}$ vanishes

Thank you kindly for your kind assistance

jg


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: tensor - Partial Differentiation
PostPosted: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:11:50 UTC 
Offline
Member of the 'S.O.S. Math' Hall of Fame

Joined: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 08:42:24 UTC
Posts: 834
jg371 wrote:

Now, here are my questions:

Why does \sum_{i\neq k, j\neq k}a_{ij}x_{i}x_{j}$ = C

C here means "constant with respect to" x_k. there's no x_k in the above sum.


and why does the term 2a_{kk}x_{k}$ vanishes


it doesn't vanish:

\sum_{j\neq k}a_{kj}x_{j}+\sum_{i\neq k}a_{ik}x_{i}+2a_{kk}x_{k}

=(\sum_{j\neq k}a_{kj}x_{j}+ a_{kk}x_k) + (\sum_{i\neq k}a_{ik}x_{i}+ a_{kk}x_k)

=\sum_j a_{kj}x_j + \sum_i a_{ik}x_i. note that now the sums are over all j and i not only over j \neq k and i \neq k.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Contact Us | S.O.S. Mathematics Homepage
Privacy Statement | Search the "old" CyberBoard

users online during the last hour
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005-2011 phpBB Group.
Copyright © 1999-2013 MathMedics, LLC. All rights reserved.
Math Medics, LLC. - P.O. Box 12395 - El Paso TX 79913 - USA