S.O.S. Mathematics CyberBoard

Your Resource for mathematics help on the web!
It is currently Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:16:57 UTC

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: help to find an exact solution
PostPosted: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 21:08:43 UTC 
Offline
Member

Joined: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 13:31:06 UTC
Posts: 11
I am trying to find an exact solution of x in this equation using seperation of variables
dx/dt=x^2/(t+1)
can anyone please help me
so far i have 1/x^2.dx=1/(t+1).dt
This where i get stuck
Please please please help
many thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: help to find an exact solution
PostPosted: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 21:09:23 UTC 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:25:14 UTC
Posts: 12172
Location: Austin, TX
robcru1 wrote:
I am trying to find an exact solution of x in this equation using seperation of variables
dx/dt=x^2/(t+1)
can anyone please help me
so far i have 1/x^2.dx=1/(t+1).dt
This where i get stuck
Please please please help
many thanks


Umm. . . this is where you integrate. . . .

_________________
(\ /)
(O.o)
(> <)
This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: help to find an exact solution
PostPosted: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 21:13:09 UTC 
Offline
Member

Joined: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 13:31:06 UTC
Posts: 11
sorry i realise that is lnx^2=ln(t+1) correct or would i be best off moving x & (t+1) up to the top and have X^-2.dx=(t+1)^-1.dt and integrate from there?
This would give me X^-1/-1=(t+1) ?????


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: help to find an exact solution
PostPosted: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 21:24:23 UTC 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:25:14 UTC
Posts: 12172
Location: Austin, TX
robcru1 wrote:
sorry i realise that is lnx^2=ln(t+1) correct or would i be best off moving x & (t+1) up to the top and have X^-2.dx=(t+1)^-1.dt and integrate from there?
This would give me X^-1/-1=(t+1) ?????


The integral of {1\over x^2} is definitely NOT \log x^2, you should be able to see that by taking the derivative to check your work. The second version is correct, and again you can check by taking the derivative. And you have to integrate both sides, not just the one, remember, you have to do the same thing to both sides if you want things to balance, if you just integrate one side that's like adding 5 to just one side, you cannot expect things to be the same on both sides if you only do things to one of the sides. Also, don't forget your +C after integrating.

_________________
(\ /)
(O.o)
(> <)
This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: help to find an exact solution
PostPosted: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 21:35:54 UTC 
Offline
Member

Joined: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 13:31:06 UTC
Posts: 11
I have integrated both sides, surely the integral of (t+1)^1 is (t+1) or am i wrong which is more than likely.
If i get the intgration correct i pressume i then just need to transpose to just leave an x=? equation
I dont want to come across as a retard so please excuse my stupidity.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: help to find an exact solution
PostPosted: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 21:37:30 UTC 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:25:14 UTC
Posts: 12172
Location: Austin, TX
robcru1 wrote:
I have integrated both sides, surely the integral of (t+1)^1 is (t+1) or am i wrong which is more than likely.
If i get the intgration correct i pressume i then just need to transpose to just leave an x=? equation
I dont want to come across as a retard so please excuse my stupidity.


$\int {dt\over t+1}\ne t+1, how did you get that? Let u=t+1 and try again.

_________________
(\ /)
(O.o)
(> <)
This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: help to find an exact solution
PostPosted: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 21:41:34 UTC 
Offline
Member

Joined: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 13:31:06 UTC
Posts: 11
Not sure what you mean
If i integrate (t+1)-1 i raise the power by 1 and divide by the new power so what am i missing.
The help is appreciated


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: help to find an exact solution
PostPosted: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 21:44:41 UTC 
Online
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:49:32 UTC
Posts: 6071
Location: 127.0.0.1, ::1 (avatar courtesy of UDN)
Locking topic. Duplicate.

_________________
\begin{aligned}
Spin(1)&=O(1)=\mathbb{Z}/2&\quad&\text{and}\\
Spin(2)&=U(1)=SO(2)&&\text{are obvious}\\
Spin(3)&=Sp(1)=SU(2)&&\text{by }q\mapsto(\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}\mathbb{H}\ni p\mapsto qp\bar{q})\\
Spin(4)&=Sp(1)\times Sp(1)&&\text{by }(q_1,q_2)\mapsto(\mathbb{H}\ni p\mapsto q_1p\bar{q_2})\\
Spin(5)&=Sp(2)&&\text{by }\mathbb{HP}^1\cong S^4_{round}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^5\\
Spin(6)&=SU(4)&&\text{by the irrep }\Lambda_+\mathbb{C}^4
\end{aligned}


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Contact Us | S.O.S. Mathematics Homepage
Privacy Statement | Search the "old" CyberBoard

users online during the last hour
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005-2011 phpBB Group.
Copyright © 1999-2013 MathMedics, LLC. All rights reserved.
Math Medics, LLC. - P.O. Box 12395 - El Paso TX 79913 - USA