S.O.S. Mathematics CyberBoard

Your Resource for mathematics help on the web!
It is currently Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:17:44 UTC

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Show PDE equation holds for u(x,t)=f(x-t)
PostPosted: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 04:01:46 UTC 
Offline
S.O.S. Newbie

Joined: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:44:46 UTC
Posts: 4
Hi everyone,

Could someone please tell me how can I use chain rule to show solution (1) in below paragraph holds?

Image

Last time I asked someone gave me below answer:

Image

But I don't understand why we have f '(x-t) instead of both du/dx and du/dt? Does f '(x-t) mean du/dt or du/dx (since chain rule says du/dx=du/dt * dt/dx and du/dt=du/dx * dx/dt)?

(I have used d because I did not have the correct character on the keyboard).

Thank you very much.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Show PDE equation holds for u(x,t)=f(x-t)
PostPosted: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 06:08:48 UTC 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:49:32 UTC
Posts: 6068
Location: 127.0.0.1, ::1 (avatar courtesy of UDN)
macdermat wrote:
Hi everyone,

Could someone please tell me how can I use chain rule to show solution (1) in below paragraph holds?

Image

Last time I asked someone gave me below answer:

Image

But I don't understand why we have f '(x-t) instead of both du/dx and du/dt? Does f '(x-t) mean du/dt or du/dx (since chain rule says du/dx=du/dt * dt/dx and du/dt=du/dx * dx/dt)?

(I have used d because I did not have the correct character on the keyboard).

Thank you very much.


No. f' is the derivative of f (as a function of one variable), and now evaluate this function at x-t to give f'(x-t). Also, you need to keep track of what you are keeping constant in those partial derivatives when using the chain rule.

Differentiating u=f(x-t) with respect to x (keeping t constant) gives \dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}=f'(x-t).
Differentiating u=f(x-t) with respect to t (keeping x constant) gives \dfrac{\partial u}{\partial t}=-f'(x-t).

_________________
\begin{aligned}
Spin(1)&=O(1)=\mathbb{Z}/2&\quad&\text{and}\\
Spin(2)&=U(1)=SO(2)&&\text{are obvious}\\
Spin(3)&=Sp(1)=SU(2)&&\text{by }q\mapsto(\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}\mathbb{H}\ni p\mapsto qp\bar{q})\\
Spin(4)&=Sp(1)\times Sp(1)&&\text{by }(q_1,q_2)\mapsto(\mathbb{H}\ni p\mapsto q_1p\bar{q_2})\\
Spin(5)&=Sp(2)&&\text{by }\mathbb{HP}^1\cong S^4_{round}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^5\\
Spin(6)&=SU(4)&&\text{by the irrep }\Lambda_+\mathbb{C}^4
\end{aligned}


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Contact Us | S.O.S. Mathematics Homepage
Privacy Statement | Search the "old" CyberBoard

users online during the last hour
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005-2011 phpBB Group.
Copyright © 1999-2013 MathMedics, LLC. All rights reserved.
Math Medics, LLC. - P.O. Box 12395 - El Paso TX 79913 - USA