S.O.S. Mathematics CyberBoard

Your Resource for mathematics help on the web!
It is currently Mon, 20 May 2013 21:43:21 UTC

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: random projections
PostPosted: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 15:32:30 UTC 
Offline
S.O.S. Newbie

Joined: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 11:13:33 UTC
Posts: 4
Let P be a random orthogonal projection on R^d, chosen according to the "uniform distribution" on the set of rank k orthogonal projections. Are the squares of any two distinct entries on the diagonal uncorrelated?

(It probably doesn't matter but I assume that k is at least 2 and d at least 2k.)

Any ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: random projections
PostPosted: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 03:52:20 UTC 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:49:32 UTC
Posts: 6006
Location: 127.0.0.1, ::1 (avatar courtesy of UDN)
Lucky Hans wrote:
Let P be a random orthogonal projection on R^d, chosen according to the "uniform distribution" on the set of rank k orthogonal projections. Are the squares of any two distinct entries on the diagonal uncorrelated?

(It probably doesn't matter but I assume that k is at least 2 and d at least 2k.)

Any ideas?


Obviously P_{i,i}=\langle Pe_i,e_i\rangle=\langle P^*Pe_i,e_i\rangle=\lVert Pe_i\rVert^2.

Let's do a simple calculation with d=4 and k=2, which has a reasonably nice coordinate system to work with.

The Haar measure on SO(4) is of course induced by Spin(4)\cong Sp(1)\times Sp(1). So upon identifying \mathbb{R}^4\cong\mathbb{H}, we might as well take 1,i as the two orthonormal vectors, and have \langle Pe_i,e_i\rangle\stackrel{\mathcal{D}}{\sim}\lvert P_2(Ue_iU')\rvert^2 where U,U' are random unit quaternions and P_2 is the projection to \mathbb{C}\subset\mathbb{H}. Now, writing U=z+\mathrm{j}w, U'=z'+\mathrm{j}w', we get
\begin{aligned}
\lvert P_2(UU')\rvert^2 &=\lvert zz'+\bar{w}w'\rvert^2\\
\lvert P_2(U\,\mathrm{i}U')\rvert^2 &=\lvert z\,\mathrm{i}z'+\overline{w\,\mathrm{i}}w'\rvert^2\\
&=\lvert zz'-\bar{w}w'\rvert^2
\end{aligned}
Switching to (spherical) polars, (and for brevity c_1=\cos\theta_1, s_1=\sin\theta_1, etc.)
\begin{aligned}
z&=c_1+\mathrm{i}s_1c_2\\
w&=s_1s_2(c_3+\mathrm{i}s_3)\\
z'&=c_{1'}+\mathrm{i}s_{1'}c_{2'}\\
w'&=s_{1'}s_{2'}(c_{3'}+\mathrm{i}s_{3'})
\end{aligned}
(\theta_1,\theta_2,\theta'_1,\theta'_2\in(0,\pi), \theta_3,\theta'_3\in(0,2\pi))
So
\begin{aligned}
P_{1,1}&=\lvert P_2(UU')\rvert^2\\
&=\lvert zz'+\bar{w}w'\rvert^2\\
&=\big\lvert (c_1+\mathrm{i}s_1c_2)(c_{1'}+\mathrm{i}s_{1'}c_{2'})+s_1s_2(c_3-\mathrm{i}s_3)s_{1'}s_{2'}(c_{3'}+\mathrm{i}s_{3'})\big\rvert^2\\
&=[c_1c_{1'}-s_1s_{1'}c_2c_{2'}+s_1s_2s_{1'}s_{2'}c_{3-3'}]^2+
[c_1s_{1'}c_{2'}+c_{1'}s_1c_2+s_1s_2s_{1'}s_{2'}s_{3-3'}]^2\\
P_{2,2}&=\lvert P_2(U\,\mathrm{i}U')\rvert^2\\
&=\lvert zz'-\bar{w}w'\rvert^2\\
&=\big\lvert (c_1+\mathrm{i}s_1c_2)(c_{1'}+\mathrm{i}s_{1'}c_{2'})-s_1s_2(c_3-\mathrm{i}s_3)s_{1'}s_{2'}(c_{3'}+\mathrm{i}s_{3'})\big\rvert^2\\
&=[c_1c_{1'}-s_1s_{1'}c_2c_{2'}-s_1s_2s_{1'}s_{2'}c_{3-3'}]^2+
[c_1s_{1'}c_{2'}+c_{1'}s_1c_2-s_1s_2s_{1'}s_{2'}s_{3-3'}]^2
\end{aligned}
So now take expectations of P_{1,1}^2, P_{1,1}^4, P_{1,1}^2P_{2,2}^2, and remember the (normalised) measure on S^3 is given by \dfrac{1}{2\pi^2}s_1^2s_2\,\mathrm{d}\theta_1\,\mathrm{d}\theta_2\,\mathrm{d}\theta_3 and you should see the covariance is nonzero. (You can cheat using Weyl's integration formula instead of passing to the explicit description of Spin(4).)

_________________
\begin{aligned}
Spin(1)&=O(1)=\mathbb{Z}/2&\quad&\text{and}\\
Spin(2)&=U(1)=SO(2)&&\text{are obvious}\\
Spin(3)&=Sp(1)=SU(2)&&\text{by }q\mapsto(\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}\mathbb{H}\ni p\mapsto qp\bar{q})\\
Spin(4)&=Sp(1)\times Sp(1)&&\text{by }(q_1,q_2)\mapsto(\mathbb{H}\ni p\mapsto q_1p\bar{q_2})\\
Spin(5)&=Sp(2)&&\text{by }\mathbb{HP}^1\cong S^4_{round}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^5\\
Spin(6)&=SU(4)&&\text{by the irrep }\Lambda_+\mathbb{C}^4
\end{aligned}


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: random projections
PostPosted: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 20:39:50 UTC 
Offline
S.O.S. Newbie

Joined: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 11:13:33 UTC
Posts: 4
ok, thanks.

I have another adjacent question. I want to estimate E|p1-t p2| from below, where p1 is the squared norm of first column and p2 of the second column, respectively, and t between 0 and one. Taking the modulus hurts me. I need an estimate from below of the form c/d, where c is a positive constant that is independent on the ambient dimension d. (It may depend on the rank k of the orthogonal projections.) I am sure that it is correct. I am pretty sure that the term dE|p1-t p2| grows for growing d and fixed k..

Any ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: random projections
PostPosted: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 10:01:19 UTC 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:25:14 UTC
Posts: 12098
Location: Austin, TX
Whoa, hold on dude. If you've been hurt by a modulus, consult your doctor first.

_________________
(\ /)
(O.o)
(> <)
This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Contact Us | S.O.S. Mathematics Homepage
Privacy Statement | Search the "old" CyberBoard

users online during the last hour
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005-2011 phpBB Group.
Copyright © 1999-2013 MathMedics, LLC. All rights reserved.
Math Medics, LLC. - P.O. Box 12395 - El Paso TX 79913 - USA