S.O.S. Mathematics CyberBoard

Your Resource for mathematics help on the web!
It is currently Mon, 20 May 2013 17:21:08 UTC

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Sets and Relation BASIC
PostPosted: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 21:11:44 UTC 
Offline
S.O.S. Newbie

Joined: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 20:32:55 UTC
Posts: 4
Hi

Let set A={1,2},

and relation R={ (1,2), (2,1),(2,2)}, would this be asymmetric? if not why??

my answer: i think yes, because (2,1) in R and (1,2) in R then (2,2) in R... but i dont know if it is the right thinking.

Or....do you also need (1,1) in R since (1,2) in R and (2,1) in R


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sets and Relation BASIC
PostPosted: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 03:56:37 UTC 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:25:14 UTC
Posts: 12097
Location: Austin, TX
GoldenPho wrote:
Hi

Let set A={1,2},

and relation R={ (1,2), (2,1),(2,2)}, would this be asymmetric? if not why??

my answer: i think yes, because (2,1) in R and (1,2) in R then (2,2) in R... but i dont know if it is the right thinking.

Or....do you also need (1,1) in R since (1,2) in R and (2,1) in R


Are you sure you mean asymmetric and not anti-symmetric?

_________________
(\ /)
(O.o)
(> <)
This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sets and Relation BASIC
PostPosted: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 04:03:31 UTC 
Online
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:49:32 UTC
Posts: 6006
Location: 127.0.0.1, ::1 (avatar courtesy of UDN)
Shadow wrote:
GoldenPho wrote:
Hi

Let set A={1,2},

and relation R={ (1,2), (2,1),(2,2)}, would this be asymmetric? if not why??

my answer: i think yes, because (2,1) in R and (1,2) in R then (2,2) in R... but i dont know if it is the right thinking.

Or....do you also need (1,1) in R since (1,2) in R and (2,1) in R


Are you sure you mean asymmetric and not anti-symmetric?


Either way it is no, not yes... ;)

_________________
\begin{aligned}
Spin(1)&=O(1)=\mathbb{Z}/2&\quad&\text{and}\\
Spin(2)&=U(1)=SO(2)&&\text{are obvious}\\
Spin(3)&=Sp(1)=SU(2)&&\text{by }q\mapsto(\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}\mathbb{H}\ni p\mapsto qp\bar{q})\\
Spin(4)&=Sp(1)\times Sp(1)&&\text{by }(q_1,q_2)\mapsto(\mathbb{H}\ni p\mapsto q_1p\bar{q_2})\\
Spin(5)&=Sp(2)&&\text{by }\mathbb{HP}^1\cong S^4_{round}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^5\\
Spin(6)&=SU(4)&&\text{by the irrep }\Lambda_+\mathbb{C}^4
\end{aligned}


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sets and Relation BASIC
PostPosted: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 04:04:13 UTC 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:25:14 UTC
Posts: 12097
Location: Austin, TX
outermeasure wrote:
Shadow wrote:
GoldenPho wrote:
Hi

Let set A={1,2},

and relation R={ (1,2), (2,1),(2,2)}, would this be asymmetric? if not why??

my answer: i think yes, because (2,1) in R and (1,2) in R then (2,2) in R... but i dont know if it is the right thinking.

Or....do you also need (1,1) in R since (1,2) in R and (2,1) in R


Are you sure you mean asymmetric and not anti-symmetric?


Either way it is no, not yes... ;)


True, but at least we can fix terminology, as "asymmetric" is not a generally useful thing to know. :-)

_________________
(\ /)
(O.o)
(> <)
This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Contact Us | S.O.S. Mathematics Homepage
Privacy Statement | Search the "old" CyberBoard

users online during the last hour
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005-2011 phpBB Group.
Copyright © 1999-2013 MathMedics, LLC. All rights reserved.
Math Medics, LLC. - P.O. Box 12395 - El Paso TX 79913 - USA